New Delhi, March 22 (CRICKETNMORE): The BCCI Committee of Administrators (COA) on Wednesday issued a clarification to what it described as "misconceived" media reports suggesting that the Maharashtra Cricket Association (MCA) and Gujarat Cricket Association have been selected as the only full members of the board from these two states. Struggling David Warner confident of turnaround with bat

Advertisement

"These reports are misconceived and appear to be based on a wrong understanding of the document named "Memorandum of Association and Rules and Regulations of BCCI as finalised by the COA" ("Constitution") that has been uploaded on the BCCI website on March 18," the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) said in a statement.

Advertisement

After the Supreme Court-appointed COA listed the amended memorandum of rules and regulations that will now govern the BCCI, news reports surfaced suggesting that Mumbai, Vidarbha, Saurashtra and Baroda had lost their voting rights.

However, the BCCI has now sought to clarify the situation by drawing attention to the list of 30 names in Rule 3(a)(ii)B of its constitution, and that it does not refer to the names of associations but the names of the states.

"In states with multiple existing members, the full membership shall rotate annually among such existing members such that only one of them will exercise the rights and privileges of a full member at any given point of time. The rotation shall be as per the policy framed by the BCCI," the board clarified.

On the basis of this rule, the BCCI insisted that full membership from Maharashtra and Gujarat will be rotated annually between the three existing full members from each.

Advertisement

"The full membership in Maharashtra and Gujarat is to rotate annually between the three existing full members from each of those States as per the policy referred to in Rule 3(a)(ii) extracted above. Accordingly, Mumbai Cricket Association, Maharashtra Cricket Association and Vidarbha Cricket Association (not necessarily in that order) will get to vote by annual rotation from the state of Maharashtra."

"Similarly, Gujarat Cricket Association, Saurashtra Cricket Association and Baroda Cricket Association (not necessarily in that order) will get to vote by annual rotation from the state of Gujarat. Maharashtra and Gujarat are also exceptions to the general principle that one association will have jurisdiction over the entire state," it added.

About the Author

Saurabh Sharma
Saurabh Sharma is the Editorial Head of Cricketnmore Hindi and a passionate cricket journalist with over 14 years of experience in sports media. He began his journalism career with Navbharat Times, part of the Times of India Group, before moving to television media with Sadhna News. In 2014, he joined Cricketnmore and currently serves as the editor of the platform.
Known for his deep understanding of cricket statistics and unique storytelling approach, Saurabh specializes in cricket news, match analysis, records, and feature stories. Along with editorial responsibilities, he also works as a show producer for popular cricket video series such as Cricket Tales, Cricket Flashback, and Cricket Trivia. Read More
Latest Cricket News