Of the teams who were scheduled to play in the ICC 2026 T20 World Cup, now Bangladesh is out, and Scotland is in. This change didn't come easily, as the involved parties played less of cricket and more of a game of political manoeuvring. It's not that the T20 World Cup hadn't seen any crises before in its history, but this time, the decision to change teams due to a specific reason sparked new controversies.
Almost the same had happened in the 2009 T20 World Cup. To understand what transpired on that occasion, the story needs to commence from the 1996 ODI World Cup. The hosts were India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. As per schedule, Australia and West Indies were to play one match each in Colombo. Due to the civil war-like situation and a bomb blast two weeks before the tournament, concerns arose about the teams' safety in Sri Lanka. As a result, both teams refused to play in Colombo and forfeited their match points.
This started a new tradition and happened again in the 2003 ODI World Cup. This time, in protest against Robert Mugabe's style of governance in one of the co-hosts Zimbabwe, England refused to play in Harare. Similarly on fear stemming from a bomb blast a few days earlier in another co-host Kenya, New Zealand refused to play against Kenya in Nairobi. Both teams that refused to play forfeited their points.