England pacer Stuart Broad gave out his sharp opinion over the decision of Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) to move running out a batter while leaving the crease from the non-striker's end while a bowler is in delivery stride, also known commonly as 'Mankad' from 'unfair play' to 'run-out' category.
Until now, 'Mankading' was treated as an unfair mode of dismissal but it has now been moved to Law 38, which concerns run-outs. "Law 41.16 - running out the non-striker - has been moved from Law 41 (Unfair play) to Law 38 (Runout). The wording of the Law remains the same," said the MCC on Wednesday about the change to come into effect from October 1.
"So the Mankad is no longer unfair & is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn't it always been a legitimate dismissal & whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair & wouldn't consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill & the Mankad requires zero skill," wrote Broad on Twitter.
So the Mankad is no longer unfair & is now a legitimate dismissal.
— Stuart Broad (@StuartBroad8) March 9, 2022
Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal & whether it is unfair is subjective?
I think it is unfair & wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill & the Mankad requires zero skill. https://t.co/TuVLuHNDLn