Though LSG took the game to the final over, their drops of Urvil Patel (on 62) and Prashant Veer (twice on nine) hurt them, with the side now starting at the possibility of being the first team to be eliminated from IPL 2026.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\u201cDefinitely. I think it was a great game. Everything was coming out nicely. We knew we were going to put enough pressure on in the power play because when you practice like that, that's the kind of cricket you look forward to.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\u201cBut at the same time, I feel like there was enough time. In T20 cricket, the fielding standards have to be up there. Too many catches were dropped, and as you said, it's difficult to put it on just one thing. But a lot of character shown to come back from there was really good (on Urvil's knock),\u201d Pant said after the match ended.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Pant also praised Urvil\u2019s explosive record 13-ball fifty for CSK, which mirrored Josh Inglis\u2019s powerplay assault while making a blistering 85 for LSG. \u201cThat's the only thing. Urvil played a fantastic, unbelievable knock like Inglis for us. We knew in the power play, someone had to take that charge, and that's what Inglis did for us.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\u201cFor CSK, it was Urvil. But at the same time, the team showed a lot of character. Definitely some areas where we can work out, but kudos to CSK. They held on to their nerves better than we,\u201d he remarked.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Pant also praised Urvil\u2019s explosive record 13-ball fifty for CSK, which mirrored Josh Inglis\u2019s powerplay assault while making a blistering 85 for LSG. \u201cThat's the only thing. Urvil played a fantastic, unbelievable knock like Inglis for us. We knew in the power play, someone had to take that charge, and that's what Inglis did for us.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Pant also defended his decision-making in terms of choosing bowlers in the final overs. \u201cThat came to my mind (on using Shahbaz Ahmed in the final over), but two lefties batting, it was a tough call to have. You've got to back someone who can just go over us, and again, as Markram has for a lot of times for us in the past years, also,\u201d he concluded.<\/p>\r\n\r\n