On-field umpire Joel Wilson initially ruled Jaiswal not out after Australia\u2019s appeal for a caught-behind dismissal. However, Australian captain Pat Cummins immediately opted for the Decision Review System (DRS), challenging the on-field decision.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
The third umpire, Saikat Sharfuddoula, reviewed the available evidence. While the Snickometer (Snicko) showed no spike as the ball passed Jaiswal\u2019s bat and gloves, the television umpire relied on visual evidence of a slight deflection from the batter\u2019s right index finger and a perceived change in the ball's direction. Based on this, Sharfuddoula overturned the on-field call, declaring Jaiswal out.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Jwala Singh, who was present at the Melbourne Cricket Ground, believes that despite a seeming deflection, the batter should have been given the benefit of the doubt. \u201cI was at the Melbourne Cricket Ground, so it was hard to understand what exactly happened. Initially, the on-field umpire gave it not out, and then the decision was reviewed. From what I heard later, Snicko didn\u2019t show anything and the ball seemed to pass close to the bat.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\u201cIf we use technology, it should be foolproof and properly used. According to the technology, it didn\u2019t seem like the ball touched the bat. But then, if it\u2019s an optical illusion or not clear on Snicko, I feel this was a bit of a controversial decision\u2014no doubt about it.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Later, I heard Rohit Sharma mention that he had touched the bat. If that\u2019s the case, it adds another layer of controversy to this decision. In cricket, such choices can be very tricky. But the doubt should always be given to the batter, so I believe Yashasvi should have been given the benefit of the doubt,\u201d Singh told IANS.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Jaiswal is India\u2019s top scorer in the ongoing Border-Gavaskar Trophy and the second top scorer only behind Australia\u2019s Travis Head. The 23-year-old showcased exemplary resilience and technique in the Boxing Day Test to register scores of 82 and 84 respectively across the two innings. Jwala Singh reflected on his protege\u2019s performance and applauded him for giving his 100% in the game.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\u201cYashasvi batted very well. If you look at his performance, he scored runs in both innings. In the second innings, he batted under pressure and still contributed. He gave his 100% effort throughout.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\u201cIn the first innings, he was close to scoring a century but missed out. In the second innings, he was dismissed in an unfortunate manner when he was looking good again. I am slightly disappointed because he missed the opportunity to score centuries in both innings. That said, his effort and contribution to the team were commendable. He is a young player and has a bright future ahead of him,\u201d he added.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
With the future of India\u2019s most experienced players in doubt and many questioning the time left in Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli\u2019s careers, questions arise about who will bear the load of Indian cricket in the future. The coach also reflected on whether he sees Jaiswal take the captaincy armband in the coming years.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\u201cIn the first innings, he was close to scoring a century but missed out. In the second innings, he was dismissed in an unfortunate manner when he was looking good again. I am slightly disappointed because he missed the opportunity to score centuries in both innings. That said, his effort and contribution to the team were commendable. He is a young player and has a bright future ahead of him,\u201d he added.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Also Read: <\/b> Highest tax paying cricketers<\/a><\/p>\r\n\r\n